Kyle Rittenhouse, Tonya Couch, CBD, and a few other thoughts and opinions
Prior to listening to #InfoWars while writing and thinking about several aspects my thoughts went...
In my opinion #KyleRittenhouse who had defended others who were attacking innocence despite in a less conventional way while he kept innocence safe despite the portions of which he took a firearm across states lines which the #2ndAmendment is not for one state in the United States of America though is for all states in the United States of America, should not have had nor have the problems which he and his family have been facing. While he and his family went to law enforcement and was turned away, each and every count which he had been accused of running away from justice is actually proven otherwise since he went to law enforcement and the choice to tell him and his family to go away completely negates any false claim of him trying to avert justice.
Anyone who goes to law enforcement about what they have been accused of and/or done to work with law enforcement about what they had been a part of in whatever way to then be turned away from and by law enforcement, should not ever be labeled with such and the charges which could have been filed for such should be reviewed as to whether or not the trial should go forward if done in honesty and without lying to law enforcement. If the portion of which is called into question of which law enforcement location he should have turned himself into is a portion of, he and his family could have been told where to go instead of guessing which location and most likely they would have gone to such by their pattern of behaviour correct?
Not forgetting he had saved lives during that particular event of which instead of being labeled as he has been, he should be thanked which I suppose can be seen in reference to the donations raised and given to him and his family though an apology is important as well.
Additionally there is no reason nor excuse as to why anyone would be prevented from making a profit for themselves if within the confounds of the law as there shall be no law which prevents the pursuit of happiness nor takes away the unalienable rights of human beings to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. To be able to come up with the finances to defend himself is of importance and there is no excuse for the government of the United States of America to prevent such aspects as that only shows the guilt of the local areas additionally, in my opinion. The points made throughout this journal blog entry which had to be redone because of technological problems that should not be a problem, are far beyond the aspects which I have words for. In reference to a point I had read out in reference to the Statue of Liberty being redone in a different aspect, there is not an excuse for such in reference to the copyrights aspects because of the portions in reference to the statue being for all. Unlike writings, those copyrights are not the same.
As a side note how is it the Statue of Liberty can be used in pictures of anyone's camera or technology, out of curiosity? If by the standards read online about the Statue of Liberty in Mississippi then there is not a valid excuse as to why that artist should have had such problems, to be able to do such. Where is the law which says that is legal or valid to prevent such in reference to statuary works? If such is considered valid, why? I admit the fury and rage which would boil up to the surface if in regards of my Medal of Honor Art Project as the fact of my Medal of Honor Art Project being original as well as non-reproduceable as such would go against my Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Expression which in turn if my books were wrongly banned because of my Medal of Honor Art Project, that too would go against my Constitutional Rights. Unlike others in the government of the United States of America, there is not a non-disclosure agreement in action for my works or my life which would prevent such ever and those who would wrongfully stand in the way of where I could have not had to rely on subsidies would in turn mean the right to pursue happiness as well would have been denied to me wrongly by those who took an oath to protect and defend this country. If such were to be then I would personally be so offended for ever having fought to defend my country and the rights thereof, and that would lead me to regret so much more. I would never look at my choices the same and I would have a boiling rage which would not be calmed without such restrictions which would have wrongly been placed fully removed in ever way, and full acknowledgement in the way which should have been completed years ago. For example, 2009.
Irony, of the specific year equaling the numbers for the day in 2001. That would be such a disgrace upon so many which such sins, could not be washed away without repentence. Since it is known there is an afterlife from this point, what is more importance in that regard? The short term and the long term, or only your short term?
In my opinion I do not understand why he and his family have had to go through the level of situations including the arrest which took place as where was the 17 year old kept in reference to such, especially when he and his family went to turn him in to law enforcement? Many years ago back around 2012 I knew a male who later I learned he had dealt with certain aspects as a teenager and was charged as an adult because of #DA situation which did not render proper and fair justice which at a younger age he was put into the adult prison system for being found guilty for being associated with others who did the crime, in comparison.
There is a reason prison systems for adults are set up for adults of which if the legal age to purchase cigarettes and alcohol is at a certain age, then my question is why are prisons set up at a younger age? In turn with such similar portions of the age arrangement, then why would the biological age of consent be anything lower than the age to purchase cigarettes or alcohol?
Since there have been exceptions made for those who are not competent to stand a trial after proving such realities, why certain other aspects? When certain situations occur such as #TonyaCouch and her son which he was guilty though because she could easily afford the legal aspects are elevated wrongly, then people in society view such as ridiculous and actions afterwards are due to such sorts of and though years later she and her son were both sent to prison. However returning to my point in reference to the male I once knew in regards of justice, it is supposed to be equal and balanced and not based upon the finances or who is known. There is a reason why the image of Justice is wearing a blindfold while holding balance scales in one hand and a sword in the other, in comparison to justice's eyes being open and her hands out for a payoff. The sword represents cutting through to getting to the truth of the situation, the blindfold represents being unable to see the difference from one person's appearance to another's, and the scales are to weight the actions and choices in comparison to the evidence as to which is more truthful of such. The sword is held low because it is ready for action though knowing the weapon is not always needed, as well as the ability to raise such for the truth when feeling the need to cut through to the truth. The scales are raised because the balance should always be held higher than anything because the truth is a greater weapon, than any wielded armory. #Justice's head is raised looking proverbially upward because of knowing the higher purpose and the betterment not only for the case in front of her, though also for those who are behind such a case in the future aspects to give a proverbial nod to pay attention.
Personally it does not make sense to me as to why someone such as Tonya Couch and her son would have ease in the short term though in the long term finally deal with what was, though in the case of Kyle Rittenhouse I hope short term of problems and I hope in the long term so long as he is legally good and squared away such is no longer a problem.
Aside from whatever your political association and/or personal beliefs or opinions about one party or individual, the quote itself still is worthwhile:
"We must reject the idea that every time when a law is broken society is to blame instead of the law breaker. It is time to restore the America that each individual is accountable for their actions." President Ronald Reagan
In such Kyle Rittenhouse had followed the rule of law both in the local and state level as when bringing a firearm into #Illinois it must be registered within the Illinois area and since #Wisconsin is known to have more hunting land available the precept of taking a firearm registered federally as well as within the state of Illinois (look up those laws as each state's firearm laws differ and Illinois has strict firearm laws compared to Wisconsin) actually is not the problem in the slightest, as Wisconsin is more lenient than Illinois for gun rights. Since Illinois' firearm law is in reference for firearms coming into the state in comparison to going out of the state as if it were to do such of going out of the state such would legally be considered as forcing captivity among the citizens of, hence why the law is in reference to entering the state of Illinois and the registration is through the federal government in comparison for every individual firearm made after a certain year because of having serial numbers. If the situation was reversed and the firearm was brought from Wisconsin into Illinois the case would have more merit in my opinion, however because it was as it was there is realistically no legal standing able to be seen for such a case against Kyle Rittenhouse.
In such a different aspect though along the same lines while how my son and I wound up in Washington state is what it is and was what it was, neither my son nor I had owned the firearms my now ex-boyfriend owned and such is and was that male's responsibility to register the firearms he had with the state of Washington. I had told him to do so, though I was ignored I suppose.
However and nonetheless, he was told to do so.
Thus in wondering, why has Kyle Rittenhouse and his family had to go through such ordeals? He was defending people and property when using such a firearm and while some might not like the AR15, that is a societal aspect which the quote should be paid attention to. There are reasons for classifications of weapons and the AR15 falls within the category which is not to be disputed just because someone thinks the firearm looks scary as realistically to some what is considered as normal and pretty looking is more scary than what is considered different looking, in multiple situations. Has anyone else other than me figured out sometimes the scariest looking aspects to life are actually the better and lighter aspects in comparison to what is considered as the normal or more accepted looking aspects are truly, what should be feared?
How many who have a what is considered more normal appearance have caused more problems for those who look different just because of their physical appearance being considered more normal, compared to those who have a different appearance? Usually from what I have seen those who have a different looking appearance do not cause nearly as many problems as those who have a more accepted appearance as it is known people fear what they do not understand, and those who choose to remain ignorant about what they do not understand have no one to blame except themselves for refusing to learn in a respectful way.
While when I look at people personally I do not see the way of which others have described to me of certain situations or aspects, though I have watched and heard others and how the ones who look different in some way compared to the ones who have brought certain descriptions forward the ones who bring forward such descriptions have usually been the ones causing the problems compared to the ones who were described. Admittedly not always, though a larger percentage of the times. However I admit my own biases as I have dealt with such aspects in reference to my hairstyle and my tattoos and being told by others of their thoughts, opinions, and descriptions in comparison to the reality. Such types of perceptions have needed to be modified in my opinion as I know I am not the only one who has tattoos and a different hairstyle, though mine are as mine are which admittedly is a bit different.
Nonetheless then that particular aspect is in a reference to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr's quote of, "I dream of a day when we are not judged by the color of our skin, but by the content of our character."
The content of each individual's character is of what they stand for despite circumstances and whether good or bad adversities in life, as well as the choices and actions made whether or not seen when out in public of other people seeing. Such choices are able to be discussed as needed though in such when the possibility of not as many seeing in person when out in public, in turn is of a different measurement. The character of an individual is through the choices made not only in such circumstances, though in a combination beyond one or two moments in the overall aspect of life. The content of character is also in what has been done to overcome or to fall into depending upon the situations, and the surrounding aspects.
While there is a meme I saw which the wrote had been "You're doing something wrong if people aren't pissed off" could be considered as accurate, though in reference to upsetting others such depends on what they are upset for. If they are upset because of problems caused purposefully, then there are corrective actions for such. If people are upset because of the truth and/or because they themselves did not do the choice, that is a whole other ball of wax.
In such if the situation in reference to Kyle Rittenhouse is others are upset because he stood up and defended others being tired of seeing the constant destruction in the streets and rioting that was occurring at the time, in my opinion would such be looked at more towards helpful in comparison? Are those who are upset and angered because of their actions in such rioting and problems caused, in comparison to those who were in reality truthfully thankful he stepped in and assisted where he could? Would such individuals who were rioting as well as those who were cheering on such rioting be angered if he were to have gone along with them instead, and had shot along with instead of at those individuals? If those people were to say they would have been okay and not upset at him if he was working with them instead of against them to keep others safe, then there in the quote proves such a point.
Maybe I am biased for believe in truth and justice should be equal and appropriate though when good people stand by and do nothing, then what is the course of action for the innocence?
When such riots were occurring if I am correct it was during protests against the police and law enforcement, and how ironic such complaints were made to the police and law enforcement about someone defending while the riots and protesting was occurring against such law enforcement. Maybe just maybe instead of rushing into the streets any time a police involved shooting occurs people should wait for the body camera footage as well as the local area cameras to show the realities of the situation in full before rushing to the streets as what occurred in reference to the police officer involved in Ferguson Missouri after it was proven it was in self defense for the police officer to shoot the firearm in reference to the situation with #MikeBrown?
I think it would be better if people were to get more of the facts and have more of an open mind when looking at such, prior to rushing to judgment. Then again, I wonder how many areas were using CBD in comparison to THC.
How is it the state of #Texas has not approved #MMJ in reference to #THC compared to #CBD? CBD does not help nearly as much as THC, especially for individuals who have specific military and law enforcement/fire department EMS connected injuries. THC is much healthier for the brain as well as has additional properties which bring forward a faster recovery than any CBD strain, unless those of the Texas government legislature prefer to have more angry citizens comparatively because of the lack of THC and preference to CBD. THC also has other health benefits which CBD cannot go anywhere near, and cannot help anywhere close as much. Though of course the state of Texas is not the only state which has preferred wrongly CBD instead of THC, which of course is something which I have written about and discussed of the benefits multiple times of the more beneficial properties of THC compared to CBD.
Then again why is it legal in #WashingtonDC for MMJ for THC, though not in other states? Let me understand this correctly it is considered acceptable for the individuals in Washington DC to have MMJ to assist them, though the rest of the country of the #UnitedStatesofAmerica is considered as what? Why?
That is not only my opinion though a proven fact, in multiple medical journal studies throughout; go look it up yourself, as there are plenty of informative medical journal out there with reputable backgrounds. THC is far healthier and does far more to relieve pain as well as stress whereas CBD causes more stress and increases pain levels not only for myself, though for others as well; as realistically how many people have actually felt more relaxed with THC compared to CBD as well as how many problems have arisen in the general society since CBD has been legalized, which THC has been denied? Has there been an uptick in regards of aggressive behaviour? Has there been more people who are willing to cause problems compared to talking the situations through, in reference to the amount of CBD compared to THC? There I would guesstimate have been an increase of overall societal problems as well as anger levels in conjunction with the lack of ability to speak consistently and thoroughly in reference to the higher usage of CBD, compared to when using THC for the health benefits.
If it has not been known let me add some additional points, CBD also increases stress, makes the brain function move at a faster though unsafe pace, actually increases pain levels not only within the body though also within the emotions, and also is a factor which raises the thoughts which once were worked through in comparison to continuing to push forward and onward comparatively. Thus CBD makes people relive the trauma there has already been progress from, whereas THC assists moving forward while working through such problems comparatively and assists in relaxation gained from the progress made. Thus I do not understand why anyone would ever prefer CBD in comparison to THC, any day of the week.
From personal experience I know CBD raises my sensitivity level in which I personally feel more physical pain in comparison to when using THC, which in turn makes me far more irritable and angry in comparison to relaxed and happy. I know, I am not the only one. I also have experienced when using CBD the shorter patience I have for even the most common aspects and traits as well as my thoughts are far more jumbled in comparison to being clearer and more concise with THC, when I have used CBD. I know from experience my headaches and migraines are elevated and the migraines are more frequent with CBD, compared to the lesser amount of pain with THC overall. If you want your feelings hurt and torn into shreds, then give me CBD though be careful because then no one is safe from that rage and fury. I am not the only one, in that regard. Watch how quick my temper flares and watch how quickly I devour your soul in a chewing out session if you are that much of a masochist though then do not have the audacity to complain about the words I use for your choice to tamper with such, and do not complain about the rage that boils up and over. I personally do not recommend testing such, however I know there are individuals who have not been intelligent enough to learn not to test my patience and my temper. In a hypothetical of such a situation such could be stated as you would live to regret it, and you will not have anyone to blame except yourself.
In turn then there cannot be blame upon me or my shoulders if anyone would be arrogant enough to try such an aspect in such a hypothetical circumstance, as the blame would then be upon whomever who had chosen to use CBD instead of THC; especially if in an unknown way, sneaking a test that was not legal nor in any way at all considered as anything beyond opposite of consensual.
Hypothetically, of course.
In my opinion just as it should be considered illegal to mess with prescriptions and over the counter medications, so too should it be considered illegal to add CBD to something which was not asked for or requested; just as it has been considered as such, in reference to THC.
As a side notation I did stop by #GovernorGregAbbott's office in 2019 to request a meeting about such in person as I dropped off a handwritten letter which has not been answered, just as I have requested a mediation with Governor Greg Abbot which again was not responded to in November 2020 through a phone call mediation request; also in reference to the aspects of #SCUBADiving, as no one I knew back in 2009 told me of anyone to speak with or write to in reference of. Though I have also sent such information and in turn sending information automatically means a request for meeting, just for clarification; especially if I included my contact information upon sending such information, there is automatically because of the sending of my contact information the request to have a meeting with and speak with about such topics of information. Thus at this point since I have sent out as much information across all sorts of channels and ways the lack of response to such in the proper format as per response, has admittedly been quite a bit of an aggravation as for some it has been years in which I have not received a response.
Quite insulting, if I were to be asked. I doubt anyone else would feel insulted, in such a way when looking at such points. Then again since I am not the only one who has been wrongly ignored by those who have had the ability to not ignore, hence why so many #POTUSTrump supporters.
That should not take a head injury, to figure out.
It should not take a head injury to figure out the constant ignoring of what has been important and crucial, would lead to many more people paying attention to what has been recognized decades ago.
In such unlike decades ago, there are many records throughout multiple locations and since some individuals who had chosen to take information off of military and government installations such as The Big Blue Book. Luckily I had been able to read as I was the one who listed that book on #Amazon through #NineLivesBookstore and I made sure to read every individual detail thereof throughout the entire book of the full report, of which instead of instantly putting online I spent days combing over each page of information which unlike any prior book I had volunteered to put online for Nine Lives Books; I spent DAYS reading every individual page, of all of the information and the diagrams.
In such in reference of #TheBigBlueBook, yes alien species are real and yes they have been to earth on multiple times and in multiple locations. Some could make a joke in reference to some of what I had written in my book "Fail-Safe: The Kennedy curse fused with Science Fiction Fantasy By: Susan MeeLing" would have a few hidden tidbits of information as the only truth of such would be through my writings as others have chosen to distort quite a bit here and there. CLICK HERE FOR THE LINK TO PURCHASE MY BOOK ON KINDLE THROUGH AMAZON Though of course both the book I wrote and the book I read have minimal in other comparisons as I have taken pictures of multiple objects for years, the first time in film during a trip to #CorpusChristi. I could explain those brightly colored lines and squiggles in each of those pictures Walmart developed, though similarly to my #SCUBA Diving no one asked me. Granted I wrote a few books on such of what I did, and again it would actually have been appreciated to have simply been asked instead of assumed. You do know what assume spells and means, I guesstimate.
For one example, my Medal of Honor Art Project and the situations surrounding. For another example, my SCUBA Diving which has been something I have discussed in detail for years before stopping any talk about because of the lack of concern seen though now bringing up more frequently because of THE NECESSITY. It is not something which is to be ignored anymore, unless you prefer at your detriment. That is not a threat, that is a fact. Where is the ocean and the particles thereof of the ocean, located? Everywhere? Okay. However really quickly so it is more known the following markers of the guys in my Medal of Honor Art Project artwork I completed below, are the markers I spent hours cleaning dog crap off of.
The historical and spiritual rubbings of each of those markers were not able to be completed until I cleaned off each and every piece of dog crap off of each marker area and though Nakamura's historical and spiritual rubbing is a different type of marker as the area has both types, it was only because of the water from the sprinkler which had wettened the stone which I could not put the rice paper on to get the rubbing for. Though that also lets you know what I had to deal with in order to clean off his entire longer and wider marker, to ensure the area was completely clear.