I do not understand antisemitism nor the way people can look away from the realities of such atrocities during the times of World War II, thinking or wishing to believe such was not important. I remember reading #Night By #EliWiesel in Elementary School then going to the library to find more books to read more to research because I could not believe how horrid the conditions were and needed to know more of how to prevent such from occurring ever again, yet the fact I have met some who either did not believe it was such a big deal or even worse those who wrongly glorified the Nazi party for what they stood for, thinking it was not a big deal as to what occurred; while also meeting people who thought only one group of people were targeted, and treated as such.
Remember it began with the labeling of different groups throughout the society then it was about separating the different groups of people by the labels which were given in reference to the #Hebrews, the #Christians, the #LGBTQP, and etcetera before the concentration camps began. Which then after a bit all it took to get someone taken to a concentration camp was the equivalent of the #SalemWitchTrials of not liking another person or the way they looked or the way they spoke to others, for the treatment and isolation of.
Why does it feel as though in the current times of which there are similarities, and where did that begin? Which group of people in the modern times had thought to bring such types of ideology to the #UnitedStatesofAmerica and further around the world? Why does it feel similar in reference to the ideology of the radicalized Muslims in reference to such in regards of what I heard on the radio, in reference to the public school systems in the local and state areas of the United States of America? I understand and know not all Muslims are radicalized, however if Sharia Law is being discussed and taught to further that particular view point into the younger generations, how is such considered truly that different from certain ideologies of the Nazi party which singled out others to treat them differently?
When looking to the historical aspects of the radicalized Muslim views of how the clothing should be for all people though especially females, how is that considered acceptable? When taking into consideration the requirement in Sharia Law of a minimum of four males to witness and testify for the prosecution of sexual assault, how is such considered as acceptable? How is the treatment of those in the LGBTQP communities considered as acceptable if reading and studying the Sharia Law aspects, in such references? While there are peaceful aspects of the non-radicalized Muslim faith, the portions of the Sharia Law are not as pretty as some might think to be nearly as appropriate nor acceptable.
To learn from history to prevent the mistakes of the past is important, and yet there are those who are similar to the individual I knew called Cactus Jack also known as Jeffrey Kuykendall Jr who proudly wore authentic German World War II regalia thinking it was not a big deal and finding multiple aspects as funny. His excuse was 'somebody has to play the bad guy' in reference to the World War II reenactments which yes, that is true for such types of education if was for the educational aspects. However the fact he had to only purchase authentic or gather authentic and fully accurate uniforms from that timeframe was one of many problems for me which I knew he was not the only individual who looked for such, as I knew I could not be the only person who was disgusted by such. Instead of that simply stopping at that point for Cactus Jack also known as Jeffrey Kuykendall Jr, when he found out I had gone through classes after my Psalm Sunday 2000 head injury at the #JCC The Jewish Community Center in #SanAntonio #Texas, he thought it was funny and ironic of my willingness to overlook the aspects of that and urged me to convince him other good of what the Hebrews had done.
When taking into consideration of how many World War II veterans could have gone into schools to discuss the realities of in conjunction with survivors of the Holocaust in the United States of America to educate children of the wrongness of what had occurred I wonder why such had not occurred once again in reference to the Korean War, the Vietnam War, Desert Storm, the Iraq War, and the Afghanistan War without hesitation within the United States of America. How have people been so willing to forget so easily, and how have people been so willing to look the other way continuously throughout history? What has been the purpose of that and why? Back during World War II had been the statement made of "When they came for [name], I said nothing. When they came for [name], I said nothing. When they came for [name], I said nothing. When they came for me, there was no one to stand up for what was wrong."
How has the human race forgotten such, so easily?
For example in Germany where World War II began and the choice made to deny the wrong doings and attempt to erase history, can the leaders of the country see certain correlations of the radicalized view of the Muslim background in conjunction with the historical aspects of how World War II had been? Can the same be said for different areas around the Eurasian continent, in reference to not only World War II but other regional conflicts and wars as well? What about other regions with similar aspects, can that be seen?
There is another saying which I can see is quite realistic, "Those who do not learn from history, are doomed to repeat it."
Could that be seen by others in this era, other than myself?
In such aspects I have spoken out against a multitude of aspects well after writing of such beyond when in school, though I had discussed certain portions of other points in reference of the military aspects when in school. What is the breaking point for people to realize the importance to genuinely know what went wrong in the past, to understand what to learn from, to gain the wisdom to move forward for the betterment of society? In more recent times despite how certain aspects of which I have discussed and written about, I could almost pin point such to the events of 11 September 2001. How many have returned from overseas tours of duty to see the aspects of what they were fighting against on the soil of the United States of America, and within the different areas of society?
As the High Holidays for the Hebrew calendar are currently going on at this point and as so many aspects have been made available to the world because of the different ingenuities from the Hebrews have assisted the development of the human race, I am unaware as to the purpose of the misrepresentations of the culture thereof. There is an interesting dichotomy in reference to not only the aspects of the engraving upon the Marine Corps Officer sword which has the Hebrew emblem etched closer towards the hilt of the blade, and the way the United States of America's Armed Forces have been wrongly treated by certain civilians throughout the years of.
If it were not for what the individuals and groups thereof had done to continue the safety and safe keeping of the Constitutional Rights of the United States of America, there similarly would not be the improvement upon the human race as well as the continuation of the betterments progressing forward in a more positive manner for more than just a few people. Thus another dichotomy when taking into consideration how the treatment of in various references in regards of the persecution of the Hebrews and treatment thereof in conjunction when looking at the treatment of the military branches of the United States of America' Armed Forces, of which some prefer to only see the prettiness while forgetting to acknowledge the horrors which the individuals had endured and survived to persevere and bring forward the rights including religious freedoms in the United States of America and the allies of in reference to both the military individuals as well as the survivors of the Holocaust. Though such times are not the only aspects of which both sets of people have endured through such treatment when looking at the aspects in a different light, and with a more open thought process.
Is it truly difficult to see the way some aspects have occurred in reference to the rounding up of the Hebrews in reference to the Holocaust in comparison to the targeting thereof, in reference to the military individuals of the United States of America?
What about the medical treatments each endured in reference to the Hebrews during the Holocaust, in comparison though conjunction to the military of the United States of America?
If one were take a look at certain housing situations, is there an ability to see other similarities?
Taking a look into the after effects in reference of others who had not been a part of though wanting to ignore of the emotional effects of can the similarities be truthfully noticed, as many have preferred to look the other way and wrongly ignore the realities thereof?
In regards of the deceased are there ways to notice the aspects which the markers of have been viewed and taken care of, especially when taking into consideration the hours I spent cleaning dog poop off of Medal of Honor recipient markers as well as the defacing of other veteran markers; in comparison to those of the Hebrew faith and traditions?
Can it be seen and noticed of the portions which the population prefers only to notice one side while forgetting what it took and takes to maintain such, while also paying attention to those who sacrificed more than just their time?
During the time of Yom Kippur and Rosh Hashana as well as other times throughout the year, is it difficult to take even just a few moments to look around and realize what it takes for such to continue on in this era? If you do not eat meat though prefer the vegetarian and/or vegan lifestyle, are you grateful for those who took the time to grow the food? If you do eat meat, do you take time to think about those who maintained the livestock until the time for dinner? If you eat fish do you take time to think about the individuals who went out to the ocean for the food you consume, or what it took to bring that food tow where it was delivered to? Do you take the time to think about the individuals who prepare and cook the food, or do you just eat? What other areas of your life do you not pay attention to for what and how it was able to be for utilization such as the electricity to rub your place of living or where you go to, or those who are into technology stuff have you taken into consideration what it takes for them to do as such?
Do you take into consideration of your ability to speak as such chosen for expression or the religious/spiritual practices you have the ability to do or etcetera for those who came before, are now, as well as in the future to maintain such? Or do you only see what is in your immediate surroundings, and not take into consideration what all it took for such?
Reflections and reflecting about who you are and what you project into the world whether in your immediate community and/or a larger area, are important.
As a side note I personally believe and think there are those who have worked along side with General Jim Mattis who would agree there is a portion of his personal military career which could be reviewed for him to earn a Medal of Honor award not only because there has not been a Medal of Honor recipient who is above the rank of Major General since the Korean War of an officer being out in the field with the troops in a similar manner which General Jim Mattis had been without hesitation, though also I believe there are many who could easily give statements as to what was extremely beneficial to assist with the saving of lives and maintaining the safety of the various soldiers within the areas of his command. If in thought I am accurate there had been a few situations which he himself had taken control of the firearms of another which needed medical treatment so he himself could cover the soldiers within the area to advance forward, while then moving to assist with medical treatment of others while continuing to hold down the firing upon others for further advancement; in conjunctions of contacting the individuals in the local base area as well as in the United States of America to then march along with his troops to successfully take out enemy areas and clear the location to advance forward. Though I could go on with a few other details which hypothetically there are those who would be able to give more details in larger accounts of for specifically the length of time as well, to provide cover fire in other situations in a situation set; I suppose the term for the overall would be, gallantry in action above and beyond the call of duty for the culmination of.
How many Lieutenant Generals have been on the front line with the soldiers thereof fighting or even Generals, in the battlefield?
While I could be incorrect though if I am hypothetically accurate, who is it that would need such for the ability to nominate for such?
I do not deny of my own personal feelings and biases for though not having officially been introduced to him that I know of in person, however I believe there are those who would be able to attest to such actions General Jim Mattis had made of his own free will which would warrant such.