Today I went to the event in Austin and as I obviously misread that Colonel Allen West was going to attend the event, I did not see the portion for such he to be in the Dallas Texas region; as per my first Facebook live video.
This particular journal blog entry is partially about such, though also with a few questions for each to think about for themselves and their communities. Since there are the ballot issues as well as the portions of which the mail in voting has been a proven concern of problematic proportions as the amount of support for the current President of the United States of America Donald J. Trump and Vice President of the United States of America Mike Pence has been proven time and time again, I offer not only questions to think about though also possible answers for such which those who have the abilities to bring forward could see whether such is valid and worthwhile.
* If there was to be the availability to have a re-voting portion instead of recounting the obvious fraudulent and tampered with election for 2020, would it be possible for such to occur within a 15 or 30 or 45 day timeframe as per normal legal response times of 3 days total to vote in person with a valid identification?
In such the swiftness to complete such of which could occur on or before 30 November 2020 or 14 December 2020 or 29 December 2020 at the latest for the Constitutional Authority to occur for which the mandates in reference to legal voters only, would be able to reduce the possibility of tampering as well as give a genuinely fair and balanced election process. Since again the reference to the 1980s federal preventionary cause to not allow Republicans to review the ethics of the election process for the first Presidential election is in this year of 2020, such sorts of legal arguments can be made not for a recount though a reelection to ensure the fullest portions of the open election process for both sides to be fully engaged within the process. As there have been software glitches which occurred and have been found in more than one county area in more than one state because of the updates needed, this would allow all voting portions to be correctly counted in full hopefully without any furthered problems.
* As there is a movement for the 'settle for Biden' which began not long ago in my opinion to cover up the corruption in the ethical portions of the democratic processes of election, the Founding Fathers and Founding Mothers did not settle for what was found; they fought to have what is the best, and any faithful American should not want to settle for less and should want to stand up for the utter and absolute best. Are there those, who could see the reasons for such?
As I spoke with some today despite the term for marriage being called settling down, that does not mean one is to seek out just what can be found; it means to seek out what is the best and ideal for both individuals involved for the ideal union for both to become their best. There are reasons for the terms of for better and for worse admittedly because the worst situations sometimes assists to bring out the better for those involved and when there are irreconcilable differences, there is an agreement to dissolve because of the disagreements to hope for better outcomes when in the search for the short and the long term.
Though admittedly in honesty since I have not remarried because of situational alignments at the times of which to ensure the best for what was needed for my son and my daughter, personally I made the choice if such were to occur at some point it had to be correct and the other half of mine had to be strong enough to handle being with me because I know myself; thus in turn, they too have to know themselves in their weaknesses and their strengths. I could not knowingly put another or myself into a compromising situation and though I was ready and am ready, it is the other who has to be ready as well. As I do not believe in halfway doing something, the energetic portions of in conjunction with the portions of serious commitment in strength need to be.
So too though not the exact same in reference to the electoral process as it is different in certain regards, though the best interest for the country of the United States of America is pertinent. While there is the need for the betterment of overall, there too also needs to be the unselfishness when looking to better such while having the genuine concern for. Though such might come across as a bit backwards when thinking about such a role as the Presidential aspects, the reality is when being the leader of the nation it is important to ensure as best as possible to genuinely seek the repair and the healing to move forward from the known old wounds to step forward for the overall.
Healthy competition is important, though healthy is the key word.
Just as genuine love in a marriage is necessary for the marriage to work in the short and the long term, so too is genuine love necessary in reference to the country and what it stands for; just the same in regards of for each individual city and state, for such types of elections in my opinion. What is it about your local area that you truthfully love and cherish and want to make grow, is a question which each candidate should think about in reference to when running for a political position in my opinion. Politics is about making sure the people are taken care of properly in the communities thereof, or at minimum that is what it is supposed to be. Thus if some wonder why certain aspects have gone as they have, what is it that has been shown to others in such references?
The United States of America is the world's beacon of hope for moral and ethical qualities for forward progress, as per the Founding Fathers and Founding Mothers had wanted and fought for. Those who may not have known or may not have realized, there were many females who fought for the same causes of the country's founding; as both the Founding Fathers and Mothers knew there would be progress made, which the proceedings would need to be adjusted as society moved forward.
While a political party can settle for who is running for the candidacy because of the collective group, the overall voting portions of each parties candidates chosen to be the leader of should truthfully have the best of intentions in mind for the overall betterment thereof. Just as when in a large competition and as the field narrows down further and further until it is to the last final two for the round to find the winner who has earned their way to the top of the ticket for the political party before the final countdown to the electoral process, so too should such be taken into consideration for the portions thereof.
Thus with the 1980s ruling being moved to allow for the first Presidential election of this year in 2020 for the Republican Party to be able to be a part of the ethical review of how the elections are handled, I personally believe as I know others are along the same thought process there is a valid set of reasons to have not a recount but a revote. A sort of one time actual reset to move forward which gives both political parties the ability to ensure the ethical portions of which then in turn gives time to finalize working out the problems between this election until the next Presidential election, through the processes in between of the years of voting for the local and state officials throughout each election process in the middle.
One additional point in reference to the above is since the Space Force has been officially established, in such sort of aspect for there needs to be clarity for in purity to move forward. Thus in turn the portions of an honest election process would be ideal, and the best in my opinion. As there are those who know of such reasons as to why the Space Force is mandatory, such could also see the purposes as to the reasons for additionally in reference to the revote.
* While the portions of which the President of the United States of America Donald J. Trump's speech and commentary may not be considered to some as eloquent as preferred, can some see the reasons as to why such brutal honesty is needed?
Admittedly I do not deny my personal bias as I had voted for his election in 2016, as the aspects are the same in reference to this election in 2020; in both primaries I supported as well, as in both elections I voted for. However such is not only in reference to the Presidential elections for the re-voting, as I think such would be ideal for all of the ticketed portions of.
However while some may not have agreed the terminology or speech of was ideal, I do think and believe the necessary aspects have brought forward the allowances for more to be truthful to and with their own selves as well as others. In turn such beneficial aspects though rough at times are necessary for the correct forward steps towards the betterment overall, in my opinion.
I doubt I am the only one, who believes such.
Video on the way to the event: